My
most recent post for iMedia (A manual for the brand-agency-vendor relationship) was like therapy; the output of many years working
for multiple agencies and vendors. A polite nudge to all parties that times are
changing and the current models are broken. This is the not so polite ‘between
the lines’ version.
The media
planner is too busy
In
agency life I was primarily measured on the margin I could generate from the
team I had, and could only hire new team members behind the curve, never ahead
of it. The outcome was predictable and repeatable – media planners with too
many accounts having to also deal with the agency’s new wins whilst we looked
for new media planners to fill the gap.
And
did you know a media planner commonly has between 7 and 12 accounts to deal
with? Think about that – each client insists on an hour long weekly call which
requires an hour long internal team prep meeting having spent at least an hour
pulling reports and screwing around with Excel. If a media planner has 8 accounts
then that’s 24 hours of their working week gone leaving just 1.5 hours to be
‘innovative’ for each client.
That
simply doesn’t work!
Pay up or
shut up
One
the biggest problems that faces any vendor, and frankly almost any business, is
cash flow – the books have to balance and that means getting paid promptly. I
have a client today that is spending healthy amounts for prospecting with
search retargeting and happens to be running it through their agency. From the
client’s payment schedule the agency is receiving payment in full within
approximately 45 days of invoice, we however are being paid between 90 and 120
days.
The
client themselves has expressed concerns that the agency has become redundant
for them, and has been reaching out to vendors to ask if they will work
directly. It seems those vendors have taken this opportunity to vent their
frustration at not being paid to the client, making them even more certain of
their decision.
Everyone
has become motivated to not work through the agency because of the behavior of
the agency. Clearly this is a maddening situation, and not one that is ideal
for anyone involved, but whilst the agency treats the vendors like crap, they
shouldn’t complain when those vendors start to take action.
Agencies shouldn’t be treated like crap either
“Our agency”
is a common phrase and whilst efficient, forgets that an agency is a collection
of real people who have the same wants and needs as anyone else. And within an
agency there are teams who work on specific accounts for their entire working
week. The volume of the work, the level of interest these individuals have in
their client’s business and the people with whom they share the task define
their happiness. As does the way in which the client treats them - but so many
clients seem to forget about this. They feel they are paying a fee for the
service and that they can demand what they will.
In a recent
discussion with a media agency executive they said that they walk around the
office talking to the different client teams; some are uplifted, excited and
engaged while others are quiet and disinterested. Those two teams don’t know
how much the client is being billed or what the gross margin is, all they know
is how the client treats them.
One of those
two clients happens to pay a lower media management fee and has the less
experienced agency team, but the client is fun to talk to and says thank you
once in a while! As a result their media plans are better and their emails
responded to in a timelier manner.
The response
I got to this point from an old agency client in the UK says it best (us Brits
have a way with words)!
“If you [the
client] want the best possible service then don’t be a dick to your agency team.
Are you motivated to get the best from your agency? Are you motivated to get
them to be innovative, creative on your behalf? Don’t piss in their Cornflakes
every Monday morning. Don’t be the source of their stress. Say ‘thank you’ once
in a while. It’s a relationship like a marriage. What smart executives know about
managing agencies is that they don’t do it to be nice, they do it because it’s
good for them. It’s not about how big
your…” and we’ll leave it at that.
Quite.
Too many douche bag sales people
I would be
amiss if I didn’t point the finger at the vendors for their part too. I often
feel vendor execs think they are selling used cars, not media solutions. Why do
you think some kid in a badly fitting suit, 16 slides of PowerPoint and a
credit card to fund a night at a jeans bar is going to either represent you
well or lead to long term relationships?
And with
perfect timing, Andrew Ettinger just wrote an awesome piece
on iMedia about these things that salespeople get wrong, saving me the job!
Come on then, what’s the answer?
I worked for
a great guy several years back who used to drill into us the concept of
Win/Win. It’s nothing new, but feels like it is many days. Enter into
relationships with clients, agencies and vendors with the attitude of win/win
and everything gets easier.
If you’re a
client, don’t screw the agency down to the last possible percentage because the
reality is your team will suck, not care and have higher turnover. Include the occasional
thank you in your compensation the next time the team busts a gut for a media
plan or creative unit that you insist you need for Monday morning but will then
not use at all.
If you are
the agency, make sure the vendor has room to breath and can make some money on
the deal – we aren’t charities. The next time we have something innovative that
could make you look cool, you are going to be bottom of the list if you pay the
lowest amount.
And for
vendors – realize that what you ultimately sell to the agency or client will
reflect on them as individuals. Don’t cheat or bullshit your way to an IO or to
a higher fill percentage because reputations develop fast, and with the rate
media planners move around, you are soon going to be struggling for revenue.
Be nice
people, we aren’t saving babies here, just pushing pixels around.
1 comment:
Always enjoy your post. I too feel there is a shift coming. Wait. Wrong. The shift is underway.
Here in the UK the affiliate network (technology) Digital Window entered a popular award as a Performance Agency (the category once called Affiliate agency).
They're owned by publishers (money from content) Axel Springer and PubliGroupe (not Publicis).
This raised questions; "What's the role of the agency?" We had a stab at answering that: http://blog.bigmouthmedia.com/2012/04/30/the-real-value-of-an-agency-in-affiliate-marketing/
At the same time, the DSP MediaMath also moved into the agency sphere. In Germany, MediaMath's agency expansion is backed by none other than PubliGroupe.
Forrester is marking "marketing technology" as the next $1B exit business. There's only been one so far; Omniture dodging the bullet and selling to Adobe.
If VCs are being geared up for $1B exits then there's going to be a tonne of cash coming towards the tech party. Agencies need to add value or suffer.
Post a Comment